In objectively categorizing the Dominatus Paradigm through the Motivus and Zephirum I am in essence using subjective opinion to objectify the categories and those elements that fit into each. In doing so the question, yes, no, maybe are defining a personal model of what is Dominatus, what is Motivus, and what is Zephirum. These models are used for future evaluation of what is thought of as Dominatus, Motivus, and Zephirum on a natural instantaneous basis.

Here I just described the action and reaction to forming motivator status of elements being evaluated.

Male perspective determinants

Motivational Factors for positive and negative outcomes.

1. Appearance
2. Enough information
3. Sexual representation
4. Personality
5. Sociability
6. Openess
7. Reciprocal Communication
8. Experience based schema overall

Once above the M2, M1, Range Dominance is determined more by direct comparisons and more specific criteria within the above mentioned criteria as well as removal of mis-judgement. Once set into a Z range caused by any or either deficiency the candidate is more likely to remain in a Z range without further consideration.

Motivator notes

A motivator gives me that element of motivation that is so much needed by men, the increased vigor, effort, direction toward goals and source of energy that is so useful

for man who seems to have a natural tendency to move toward idolness.

Even if the motivator is not a full and complete intimate motivator, it is never the less a source of motivation. Perhaps the casual fact is the motivator would never "want" to

be a motivator, and perhaps it even goes so far as to avoid contact points, in the mind of the motivatee if compounded into the creative imagination as something beyond

the causal fact, something worthy of desire, of hope, then it surely is affective enough. If your circumstance is on ewhere the will to believe is brought about, even if it is a

counterfeit of reality, the internal motivation will never the less exist, and be beneficial to the human condition and enhance drive, happiness, possibility for success in other

areas of one's life.

Anna Notes

Less contact points of frequency and duration correlate with less motiavtion to remain acquainted. It may also be true that the contact points must be non forced, casual

contact points that allow for intimacy causing or allowing behavior.

Note while more contact points correlate with an increase in drive generalization or too frequent of contact points result in their opposite.

Motivational drive notes: no deficit drive now, but chance for future deficit. This is why or how the nature and need for financial resources differs from biological drives.. a

social phenomenon engraved into the mind through experience.

Motivation, a strange thing to study. The motive behind actions, behavior, choices. I never really noticed my studies of motivation on a personal factor until today. I was driving to the computer place to buy some dvd's and on the way there I asked myself the question. "What is my motive for driving right here, right now, down this road?" And I answered quietly of course. The question and answer period continued focusing on the "right now" period of time, everything from turning on the radio, turning off the cd, the clothes I had on, the coffee I was drinking.. everything I could possibly think of in a 3 minute question answer session about the motivation of my actions.

I didn't come to any scientific conclusions or correlations however I did find out something. For each question there was an answer. An observable, objective, recordable answer.

Now of course it's not like me to associate only one category of thinking with itself alone, I like complex thoughts, iunique combinations. So I began thinking about marketing and possible consumer behavior inside marketing patterns and began questioning consumer motive using the same question answer patterns as myself. And there I did come to a conclusion. When studying marketing we know or should know at least the 4 P's of marketing. Well it just so happens that the most profound answer to the question of motive happend to be also one of the 4 P's. The question was. "Why does a consumer purchase something from a particular shop?". The answer was location. Having the right product in the right place at the right time. Their motive not for purchasing the product, but for purchasing the product from that particular place is very often because it's there. It's close, it's available and it's ready to be sold to those who want to purchase it.

Then my mind wandered off of motive, off of consumer purchasing and onto satisfaction with the thought. Well they have the motive, they made the purchase, what would be their motive for returning. And the answer at the time was quite simple. If they are satisfied, they will return because their mind has learned that they can reach their goals there. However if they are dissatisfied, they may never return. Very important for those merchants who own shops that has nothing you want. Too bad they don't study motive.

1. More than one motivator can exist at the same time without direct competition if they exist in different contexts or environments.

2. Only 1 dominant motivator can exist at the the same time regardless of the context however the strongest may/will change over time.

3. Motivators tend to be stronger as they occur and weaker as time goes on.

4. Being in the state of motivation or having a single motivator is not reason or sufficient cuase for that motivator to build or initiate the building of anna or for the subject to be motivated to do so either outside the forced environent or change context.

5. Anna and motivators are not of the same theory, however anna and motivators do have some correlation if in only they are causal originating from one another.

6. It's easier  for a weaker motivator to cease to exist hwoever a falling 1-2-0 falls suddenly and sometimes without obvious reason.

7. At the point where one motivator is the same context overpowers another the first motivator diminishes power.

8. New motivators have more temporary power than stale, extinct,  or generalized motivators.

9. The biological explanation of a vanishing motivator would be either non-life sustaining realizations, non-reproductive or non-optimum opportunities, or for the temporary separation for increased attention in offspring raising.

Here "a knock at the door" was analyzed from an earlier poem I wrote. As we can see 350 BC starts us out and then on into the late 1900's and 2000s. A knock at the door,  a very nice fragment to follow.

Fragment searched  "against the wall near" found 3 matches. This was taken from an article I published recently, please click the link to see the article. By the way, I have never read any of these three books and the fragment seems so common, against the wall, that it may not be relevent to any further research.